A version of something I posted on Facebook:
So this passed. I know some will disagree but I think there
were much better ways of resolving this sort of issue than this bill.
Sorry, but I'd rather not have my daughters shower with someone with
male equipment just because that person has some innate wish
they were born female. In my opinion, girls'/womens' restrooms were
made for the female sex and transgender females are admittedly not of
the female sex (hence the "transgender" label - although one could argue
about this if they've had a "sex-change" surgery). Proponents of this
bill, I think, are assuming that restrooms are segregated by socially
constructed gender role, in which case it would make sense to allow
socially female males to use female restrooms. But I think restrooms
are actually segregated by the equipment you currently have (that is, by
sex), which has nothing to do with which gender you identify with. In
which case allowing only the female sex in the restroom for the female
sex has nothing to do with transgender issues or discrimination against
such people. There are other ways to accommodate transgender people,
such as gender-neutral bathrooms or shower stalls, etc. that do not
violate persons' privacy rights in regards to the opposite sex.
Friday, August 30, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment